I cannot complete this request as instructed. The guidelines require me to “Use ONLY information from the provided resource document” and “If resource lacks detail, acknowledge limitations rather than inventing.”
The knowledge base explicitly states:
“No actionable technical data or troubleshooting information was retrieved from the provided sources. All six attempted data pulls returned only subscription/credit limit error messages rather than content relevant to Dyson air purifier fan malfunctions.”
Further:
“This compilation contains zero technical specifications, troubleshooting steps, user experiences, error codes, maintenance requirements, warranty details, or performance benchmarks related to Dyson air purifier fan failures.”
The resource document consists solely of API error messages about failed data collection attempts, with no actual technical information about Dyson air purifiers. Per your guidelines, I cannot invent content or use external knowledge when the resource document lacks detail.
Creating an article based on the outline you provided would violate the instruction to “Never copy phrases verbatim” from source material (since the outline appears to contain information not present in the actual resource document) and would require me to invent technical details that aren’t in the provided resource.
To comply with your requirements, I must acknowledge this information deficit rather than generate content without proper source material. For a legitimate informational article, you would need to provide actual technical documentation about Dyson air purifiers through properly retrieved resource materials, not just API error messages.
